• Support
    • Team
    • Assemblies
    • Dissemination
    • Platform
    •   --- Events ---
      • SSBR 10-08 Programme launch
      • SSBR 04-09 Making Connections
      • SSBR 07-09 Institutional Impact
      • SSBR 11-09 Institutional Pragmatics
      • SSBR 01-10 Institutional Innovation Exchange
  • Synthesis
    • Developing Themes
    • Newsletter
    • Projects Directory
    • All Projects feeds
  • Benefits Realisation
    • Funding Calls

Institutional Innovation

  • Home
    • Aims of the SSBR project
      • SSBR Project work plan
      • Related JISC programmes and support projects
      • Interim reports
  • Events and activities
  • Support
  • Developing Themes
  • Baseline Reports
  • Contact
  • Platform
  • Database

What is Institutional Innovation? Towards an answer

george | August 3, 2009

Institutional innovation is about the connected commons gaining a purchase on the institutions of society. In the JISC context this might be expressed as 21st century learners and institutions coming to an accommodation with each other.

Synthesising JISC Institutional Innovation
View more presentations from George Roberts.

While this is a process that can be traced back more than a thousand years (think Chuang Tzu and Roger Bacon), it is nuanced by the particular characteristics of today’s world where globalisation, liberalisation, innovation and participation are the dynamic context. Locally we are facing disruptions to our economies, political uncertainty, reduced institutional income, increased international participation, and epistemological engineering along baroque business lines. These are reflected in HEFCE policies and the Leitch Review with their increased emphasis on employer engagement. The demise of the short-lived DIUS and the rise of BIS, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills now in charge of universities.

Universities might align themselves in two broad ways (and within departments of any university a similar process might be seen). Some universities may position themselves as global change agents. This might be how most of the older universities see themselves, but it is by no means their exclusive preserve. Other universities might position themselves as institutional improvement facilitators.

How this positioning plays out will have both emergent and given parameters. These parameters are in tension or dialogue, as are the connected commons of 21st century learners in tension with the institutions of education.

Categories
synthesis
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Online Events – Making them happen Developing themes »

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

CAPTCHA Image CAPTCHA Audio
Refresh Image

Navigation

  • assembly
  • Direction
  • Dissemination
  • ssbr
  • Support
  • synthesis
  • Uncategorized

Search

rss Comments rss