• Support
    • Team
    • Assemblies
    • Dissemination
    • Platform
    •   --- Events ---
      • SSBR 10-08 Programme launch
      • SSBR 04-09 Making Connections
      • SSBR 07-09 Institutional Impact
      • SSBR 11-09 Institutional Pragmatics
      • SSBR 01-10 Institutional Innovation Exchange
  • Synthesis
    • Developing Themes
    • Newsletter
    • Projects Directory
    • All Projects feeds
  • Benefits Realisation
    • Funding Calls

Institutional Innovation

  • Home
    • Aims of the SSBR project
      • SSBR Project work plan
      • Related JISC programmes and support projects
      • Interim reports
  • Events and activities
  • Support
  • Developing Themes
  • Baseline Reports
  • Contact
  • Platform
  • Database

I was asked to comment on difference between education, training, learning

george | August 24, 2009

I used to be concerned in this direction when making a transition from working in industrial training and development education to working in educational development roles in higher education.

All categorisations of this sort serve to channel people and institutions into differently funded and privileged regimes. There are no essentials of this sort. Conceptual categories are constructed. These constructions do have agentive force in networks of inference or meaning (epistemologies, actor networks, discourses). They may be useful tools of development. They may also be part of a colonial apparatus of social control.

For this reason institutions like the JISC aligns itself with “higher education” while Becta aligns itself more with high school, further education and training. So an inverted way of defining these terms is to see who funds or supports instances of named interventions, in what context.

The terms can be conflated: e.g.:
http://www.marcprensky.com/dgbl/Prensky%20-%20Selected%20URLs%28web%29.htm

Some of my key texts were:

  • Ahier, J. & Esland, G. (1999). Education, Training and the Future of Work I: Social, political and economic contexts of policy development. London: Routledge in association with the Open University.
  • Ball, S. (1990). Industrial training or new vocationalism? Structures and discourses. In Politics and Policy Making in Education. London: Routledge.

A later work by Avis continues in this vein:

  • Avis, J. (2006). From reproduction to learning cultures: post‐compulsory education in England. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(3), 341-354. doi: Article.

It is conventional to differentiate between education and training using aphorisms, e.g.: training teaches you how; education teaches you why. See e.g.:

  • http://bit.ly/TtGRk
  • http://bit.ly/TFnnE
  • http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/aureview/1985/jan-feb/kline.html

Higher education is often differentiated from further education by using the concept of “criticality” as a discriminator. various e.g.:

  • http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=271416
  • http://aeq.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/53/3/154
  • http://www.mcgraw-hill.co.uk/html/0335211321.html

Posted via email from George’s posterous

Categories
Direction
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Preliminary Thoughts on Visualising #opened09 #jiscssbr 55 out of 193 countries (28%) account for 97% global GDP and 99% IT expenditure »

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

CAPTCHA Image CAPTCHA Audio
Refresh Image

Navigation

  • assembly
  • Direction
  • Dissemination
  • ssbr
  • Support
  • synthesis
  • Uncategorized

Search

rss Comments rss